Search for: "In re APA ASSESSMENT FEE LITIGATION"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
All of this litigation was decided in [defendants’] favor” (id.). [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Re-examining acts of God. 27 Pace Envtl. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not permit an award for defending a fee application, and the “American Rule”, by which litigants pays their own attorney fees, win or lose, unless a statue or contract provides otherwise, also counsels caution. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
By William W. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Fifth Circuit held that egregious and unsuccessful prosecution of Fair Labor Standards Act warrants award of defendants’ legal fees. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Second, Vaz’s APA claim was properly grounded on 5 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
Div. lack of a right to payment under Water Quality Act is dispositive that claim not discharged in BK. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/MarkIV-SDNY-Scheindlin-9-28-11.pdf … D-SDNY reviews law re extent to which an environmental cleanup obligation constitutes a dischargeable claim in BK. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/MarkIV-SDNY-Scheindlin-9-28-11.pdf … B-SDNY reminds that §1521(a)(4) may not authorize the… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
Cir. 2010); Enzo APA & Son, Inc. v.Geapag A.G., 134 F.3d 1090, 1093 (Fed. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Court: U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-12990 September 16, 2011 Judge: Per curiam Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Immigration Law Plaintiff appealed the district court's judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus and his complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
City of San Diego (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 488, the court held that the Council’s attempt to expand the project definition and set the CEQA baseline to include the condition of the property prior to demolition of the cottage was improper, because the decision to authorize demolition was final and not a subject of the current litigation. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Mehta A very interesting decision regarding medicare reimbursement rights came down that will affect how people can litigate their cases and how they must determine medicare reimbursement rights. [read post]
